David James Blott Resigns


On June 13, 2014, a Resignation Committee of the Benchers of Alberta's Law Society, granted David John Blott to resign pursuant to s.61 of the Legal Profession Act.  We are told that this is the same as being disbarred.  

Or is it?  Let's take a look at s.61.


Resignation instead of continued proceedings

61(1) Subject to the rules, a member whose conduct is the subject of proceedings under this Division may at any time during the proceedings apply to the Benchers for their approval of the member’s resignation as a member instead of having the proceedings continue.

(2) The Benchers may hold a hearing of an application under this section if they consider that a hearing is warranted in the circumstances. 


(3) The Benchers may reject the application or, if they accept it,

(a) may make their acceptance of the application subject to any conditions the Benchers consider appropriate in the circumstances, and 

(b) shall give directions as to the information to be entered in the roll in relation to the member’s resignation.

(4) If a person resigns as a member pursuant to this section, then, subject to any conditions prescribed by the Benchers pursuant to subsection (3)(a), proceedings under this Division shall be discontinued in respect of the conduct that was the subject of the
proceedings and to which the resignation relates.

(5) The Benchers may delegate any of their authority under this section to a committee of the Benchers.

RSA 2000 cL-8 s61;2003 c42 s12 

Definitions

1 In this Act, 

(c) “disbar” means terminate the membership of a person in the Society by

(i) an order made under Part 3 or an order under any predecessor of this Act of the Benchers then holding office, 
or
(ii) the resignation of that person under section 61

According to the LSA's Resignation Committee Report, Blott was ordered to pay costs in the amount of $60,000 over three years (out of aggregate costs of $215,000).  

The report further states that should Blott apply for reinstatement to membership, he will have to pay the balance of those costs.

The above is what amounts to the punishment Blott received from the Law Society of Alberta (LSA) and does not reflect any civil or criminal justice.



Calgary Lawyer "David Blott" Disbarred



According to the Canadian Press on June 13, 2014, The Law Society of Alberta disbarred the lawyer accused of misconduct in his handling of settlements awarded to survivors of residential school abuse.

"The panel heard that between 2006 and 2012, Blott’s Calgary law firm handled almost 4,600 residential school claims, many in southern Alberta. Information was taken from each victim who would sign a retainer agreement. If the settlement were $100,000, Blott would receive $15,000 from the federal government and up to an additional $15,000 from the settlement payout.

“The tragic reality … is what started out as a reconciliation effort in the righting of wrongs turned into what can only be described as a factory of gross self-interest, where victims of the residential school system were essentially revictimized and treated less like human beings and more like cattle,” said Harvie.

“They were in fact dehumanized by a process where the ultimate goal appears to be making as much money as possible with the least amount of personal attention.”


Blott’s lawyer Roy Millen said although his client acknowledged there was evidence of wrongdoing, he wasn't admitting guilt to anything.


Blott told the panel he accepted the statement of facts 
presented by his lawyer yet offered no apology and also stated: “I don’t have anything to add.”

Some of the agreed upon facts included the following:

  • Blott used the services of two non-lawyer companies – Honor Walk Ltd. and Residential Schools Healing Society – and their form-fillers to solicit clients and process their claims.
  • Those companies were operated by then-Calgary entrepreneur Thom Denomme, who met Blott in 2005.
  • They charged survivors for their services and, in violation of the IAP, took the money straight from the compensation payout.
  • Using their services implied hiring Blott as their attorney.
  • File administration was done by a third company – Hands-Free Office Systems – run by Denomme’s girlfriend Jennifer Mackenzie, then of Bragg Creek.
  • Employees of all four companies worked out of each other’s offices.
  • Denomme directed form-fillers to stick to certain ‘harms’ Blott said were commonly accepted by adjudicators of the claims.
  • Blott paid Denomme $200,000 a month, amounting to more than $6 million through 2011.
  • Blott lawyers failed clients in most areas, especially when they reviewed applications over the phone instead of in-person and submitted claims.
  • Claims were altered, submitted late and sent in even if clients had died.
  • Documents were pre-witnessed, signatures were cut and pasted onto forms, and wrong dates were used.
  • 1,159 applications were found in storage that clients believed had been submitted.
  • 182 applications were labelled Do Not Qualify while, in fact, some of them did.
  • Four times Blott told clients their claims were rejected by the government when, in fact, it was he who rejected them.
  • Blott charged the highest fee allowable under the IAP of 30 per cent in each case.
  • Clients could not reach Blott & Company lawyers by phone.
  • Blott handled 380 loans for 77 clients contrary to third-party rules in the IAP.
  • 10 lenders loaned the principal amount of $3.3 million.
  • Three of the main loan companies were Settlement Lenders of Edmonton, Bridgepoint Financial of Toronto and Funds Now of Calgary, operated by another friend David Hamm of Calgary.
  • Hamm would sell big-screen TVs and laptop computers to clients from their loans.
  • Hamm received a 20 per cent finder’s fee on each of his loans.
  • Blott’s brother invested in Funds Now.
  • Interest fees on loans ranged from 19.95 per cent to 29.95 per cent annually or between $50 and $500 monthly, and deducted from compensation awards.
  • The fee charged by Funds Now increased the interest to exceed a criminal rate of interest that exceeds 60 per cent annually.


Blood Tribe in Alberta File Class Action



As an avid on-line shopper interested in all things natural, I checked out the website of the "Blood Tribe" in southern Alberta. The Blood Tribe inhabited what is now Southern Alberta and Montana long before any treaties and borders were imposed.


 "Head smashed in buffalo jump" is a tourist attraction built by the Alberta government on their land.

In visiting their site, one immediately feels a sense of comfort, whether it's from the words written, the beauty in the pictures, or in the knowledge of such honest and caring individuals, the feeling is serene.


Announced on their web-site is the filing of a class action law suit by three of their members - and it was filed against the lawyer that was supposed to help the many victims forced into the heinous residential school system.

Myself, I only became aware of these schools a few years back, as did many of my friends. Upon learning that the Residential School System was actually yet another act of genocide - is just something so unforgivable and shameful, no words can express how deep the sorrow is.

The defendant in the class action lawsuit - a David Blott, had a basic fiduciary duty to protect his client's best interest and to ensure that each receive their right to proper compensation. As a result of that lawyer's gross negligence and breach in fiduciary duties, many victims were denied compensation altogether while others received far less than what they should have received. 


It is estimated that Blott and his cronies billed in excess of 14 million in fees - fees that were appropriated from the very clients they were supposed to be protecting!!!! 

This gets worse - apparently Blott and his pals set up corporations to loan their clients advanced funds but then charged them interest at rates exceeding 50%!

This type of abuse will surely prevent other people from engaging the services of lawyers under normal circumstances. However, these were not normal circumstances; the actions of this one lawyer is so heinous and so despicable, one wonders how anyone could ever trust that profession again.

The Calgary Herald includes more details obtained from the filed statement of claim and that story can be read by clicking the following link:

Calgary Herald story from Nov 2/13

Although Blott was relieved from inadequately representing other Residential School Victims including current clients being yanked from his disservice, the Law Society in Alberta has not yet disbarred him as they are still conducting their investigation.


Is someone like that able to look themselves in the mirror without shame?

Known Cancer Cures: Cancer Cures Revisited



"Known Cancer Cures: Cancer Cures Revisited" is the just released new book by Ryder Management Inc. and available at Amazon in Kindle.



Dr. Hulda Clark, in her book, "The Cure for all Cancers", states that all cancers are alike and are caused by a parasite.  In fact, in our new book shown above, the common denominator of all known cancer cures is ridding the body of parasitic infection.  Rene Caisse used a combination of herbs to accomplish this, as did Harry Hoxsey.  Max Gerson used coffee enemas to rid the body of toxic parasitic infections.  Soursop from the Graviola tree is a strong antiparasitic remedy; and the list goes on!

This book is offered free on beginning September 6, 2014 at Amazon on Kindle!

Despite the FDA not admitting that cancer begins with a parasitic infection, a look at the known cures reveal a high efficacy in terms of antiparasitic qualities as a common denominator in the known cures. "Cancer Cures Revisited!" Free tomorrow, Saturday Sep 6/14, at Amazon!
Buy the above book today to revisit known cancer cures to begin your research and pass on this true and hidden fact about cancer, a simple disease that can be cured!

Colony Collapse Disorder CCD and the Sugarcoating of Neonicotinoids, a Class of Insecticides


It began in the 1980's by Shell Oil Company.  In the 1990's, enter Bayer AG, a German chemical and pharmaceutical company whose prime areas of business include human and veterinary pharmaceuticals; consumer healthcare products; agriculture chemicals and biotechnology products, plus, let's not forget high value polymers.  This company is now 150 years old.  150 years wherein the health of all living things have declined.  

Scientific evidence: "How do you want the results to read?"   

Colony Collapse Disorder, we are supposed to believe, is caused by an unknown source for unknown reason.  Isn't this another pat answer from Big Pharma with respect to the rise of diseases of unknown sources?  With all the money pumped into finding answers, why do so many more questions arise?  Prior to the rise in Big Pharma, we relied on Mother Earth.  However, with the rise of the FDA and all it governs, our health and the health of our environment has steadily declined.  

Back to the Bees.  Those cute little creatures that cause no harm and are as valuable as plants themselves.  Are we going to just standby and be lead to believe that CCD is something to accept?

Are you aware that honey contains flavonoids and antioxidants that help reduce the risk of cancer and heart disease?

Honey also helps with such disorders as ulcers and bacterial gastroenteritis.

Honey is also anti-bacterial since the bees add an enzyme that makes hydrogen peroxide (a buried cancer cure).

Honey heals wounds and burns when directly applied.

Honey regulates blood sugar.

Honey balances the five elements in Ayurveda medicine - and has done so for over four thousand years.

Honey acts as a probiotic.

The above is only a touch of the ice-berg.

Can we really stand back and accept the eradication of our much needed bees?



Benjamin Franklin



1764

Benjamin Franklin is asked by officials of the Bank of England to explain the prosperity of the colonies in America.  He replies,
"That is simple.  In the Colonies we issue our own money.  It is called Colonial Scrip.  We issue it in proper proportion to the demands of trade and industry to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers.  In this manner creating for ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay no one."
As a result of Franklin's statement, the British Parliament hurriedly passed the Currency Act of 1764.  This prohibited colonial officials from issuing their own money and ordered them to pay all future taxes in gold or silver coins.  Referring to after this act was passed, Franklin would state the following in his autobiography,
"In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the colonies were filled with the unemployed...The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money which created unemployment and dissatisfaction.
The viability of the colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of King George III and the international bankers was the prime reason for the revolutionary war."
Control of America's money system will change hands 8 times since 1764.

What does the above all mean?

Think!

The following is a known quote:

: "Let us control the money of a country and we care not who makes its laws."  (Hint the surname is: Rothschild)


What is Network Marketing





The New York Times bestselling author of "Rich Dad Poor Dad" Robert Kiyosaki has stated that network marketing is the business of the twenty first century. 

Network marketing is a method of direct selling that is basically made up of two parts: selling the product or service and recruiting .  Network marketing has been formally defined as "a direct selling method in which independent-agents serve as distributors and are encouraged to build and manage their own sales force by recruiting and training other independent agents.  Commission revenue is earned on the agent's own sales as well as on the sales revenue of that agent's recruits." 
businessdirectory.com/definition/network-marketing/html  


An agent's recruits are referred to as their "downline".  Network marketing is also known as "multi-level marketing (MLM)".  Network marketing is extensively used by numerous organizations including communication services, internet access and hosting services, financial programs, electrical power, solar power, insurance agents and more specifically tupperware, Amway, Mary Kay etc.

When a network marketing system is mainly acquiring its revenue from recruitment, it is dangerously treading on a pyramid scheme which is considered illegal.  By definition, network marketing is NOT a pyramid.  Normally there is no product involved in pyramids as its only concern is collecting money from new recruits.  A pyramid is just a money game and has no basis in real commerce.

Network marketing is a legitimate business.  It's based on providing real people with real legitimate products or services that they want and need.  Very little upfront capital investment is is required in any network marketing organization and there are no geographical boundaries.  Its proven system is based on basic dynamic principles that have been designed, created and paid for my the corporate team that has successfully gone through it before and now supplying it as the framework for new agents.  The real key behind network marketing is leverage.  

The advantages of network marketing are plentiful and include flexible hours, a perfect home based business and more.  This will be reviewed and continued in my next blog.







How to Negotiate with Rogers



I am a person that was “Born to Socialize”.  I love parties.  I love them for the interaction involved.  I hold “party manners” in high regard.  Everyone is equal and is beautiful.   

“Born To Interact” was a label given to me.  

The glass is always full, or will be .. I can bring out the “Cuteness” in people – usually by bringing out their wit.

 I frown on those that judge.

Despite the above, I am not able to hold my temper when It comes to dealing with Rogers or Bell (or any such company that train their people to intimidate those that are us and their customers.  They seem to have us by the short and curlies - and that, in itself is MADDENING).

Big business, Big Pharma, Big Government, Big Financial, Big Allopathic, Big GMO, etcetera etcetera)

What is the point of this blog?

I am presently studying marketing.  Affiliated marketing to be more precise.  Specifically it is under the auspices of smimg.com/leadershop/199175 - to be precise. And I am very proud to share how I did NOT get mad nor hang up on our  entertainment providers (internet, cable, phone). 

Allow me to digress. 

Whenever I used to call our cable/internet/phone provider, usually for an unapproved charge–I would end up becoming so mad that I would hang up (more accurately, I would slam the phone down).  

I have gotten so frustrated when I called, I had to stop calling.

 One time, they insisted I don't understand "allocation".

"I'm an accountant, of course I understand "allocation",  it's simple algebra, after all!"

The front line staff  are very sneaky too.  I say this because when they have agreed with the charge I was disputing,  and I felt somewhat OK to hangup, once the bill arrived, I would lose it. 

 The bill was so convoluted with debits and credits - pluses and minuses - it screams "dummy!".  This is just another trick they use.  However, this trick, is just that, a trick.  It involves "confusing the customer into thinking they received a reduction for the disputed charge.  By showing the expected credit, then a debit or two, another credit, two more debits -they to give you a headache make you just not bother with it.

It's rather to determine how much they burned you this time by adding the "adjustments"  together. Simple math should tell you that the result should equal a negative amount - i.e. the disputed charge. 

The amount was positive.  And I don't understand allocation?

In the past, when their name would come up, the first words that would come to mind were "short and curlies".

Most recently, after learning a "ton" of information at www.sfimg.com (discount sign up code = 14199175), I decided to try a new tactic in dealing with our outragisly, overpriced communication bill. I am very happy with the outcome and very proud of myself  for doing such a great job.  I successfully negotiated way more features for each of cable, internet and home phone services PLUS reduced the overall charges by half.  This is also guaranteed for one year not to increase in any way AND there is no commitment necessary on my part.   

I will be even more ecstatic - once  the bill arrives and the correct charges are shown.  In the mean time though, I"M LOVING all the new features!  I'll be doing the cell phones next. t.

Do try this tactic for yourself:

It is necessary to do some research prior to calling your provider.  Do not call them until you have googled “internet, home phone, cable, wireless providers - and the name of your town”. You're looking for the competition and the deals they're offering in your area.  Write down the top deals in your area and who has them.  

Next, decide what features you do want and what you're willing to pay, relative to what's out there

When you have finished the above, you do need to "get into character".  You' want to sound up beat and cheer; think about all the new features you will soon be receiving. "Upbeat and cheery"  is necessary to be reflected in your voice. 

When you are ready to place the call, your opening line should go something like the following:

 "Oh HI!  I’m calling to give you the 30 days -  advance notice - required for me to cancel all of my services." 

The front line staff are not allowed to let you go without a fight. They will tell you they do NOT want you to go and they will ask what it will take to keep you. 

At this point, you can recite a package you found and want OR you can ask what they have to offer.   Knowing what the competition is offering can certainly be used as leverage. In fact, they may insist knowing what you have been offered in order to top it.   Alternatively, they could insist on knowing, exactly what would make you happy enough to cancel your other order and stay with them.  

When dialing in, do follow the prompts to take you to "cancel all services". 


We now have a lot more bells and whistles (SOA, Storage Wars, Movies, Sports); faster internet services and a cheaper home phone with extra services – ALL -  at half the price we have been paying for far too long.  To boot, the prices are GUARANTEED for a year YET we can cancel at any time.